A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
1 Thessalonians 1:7 so that you became an example to all the believers in Macedonia and in Achaia.
Verse 7 speaks of the consequence of the actions described in verse 5 and 6, that the Thessalonians were presented the gospel and became imitators of the men who presented this gospel to them. We addressed the term “imitator” in an earlier posting, but Paul uses another term, somewhat related to imitator.
To be an imitator is to follow one as a model, a reference to finding and following a guide, having a goal to copy in order to become like that person. To imitate is to follow someone in their mannerisms, character, desires, ethics, sufferings and thoughts.
To be an example is to be that which others may imitate. Paul is beginning to teach on the very same principle he instructed Timothy of years later.
2 Timothy 2:2 and what you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others also.
Although Paul is speaking to the church as a whole, in that their body life was a fantastic example for other churches to imitate, the process of multiplication in the same in body life as well in personal discipleship. Our lives either impact the church in a positive way, as the Thessalonian church did according to Paul, or our lives impact the church negatively.
One church that did not have the full endorsement of the apostle was the Corinthian church. His non-commendation is expressed throughout the first epistle, but man be clearly noted in chapter 11.
1 Corinthians 11:17 But in the following instructions I do not commend you, because when you come together it is not for the better but for the worse. 1 Corinthians 11:22 What! Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I commend you in this? No, I will not.
Even though the apostle Paul stayed with the Corinthians for much longer than he did with the Thessalonians, his presence and manner of life did not seem to “stick” with the metropolitan Corinthians.
Note that in the epistle/letter to the Corinthians, the internal difficulties were addressed directly with the church. As my momma used to say, “don’t be showing everyone your dirty laundry!” Paul addressed the issues of the Corinthian church, with the Corinthian church. We have the privilege of reading this letter of holy writ, but it seems the intent of Paul was to be direct with the church and not enter into a public discourse “showing everyone the Corinthians dirty laundry”.
Not so with the Thessalonians. Paul spoke of them as examples to the churches in Macedonia and Achaia, (which coincidentally contained a church named Corinth.) These believers molded themselves to be such imitators that they became examples for others to follow. And Paul told everybody!
This is a very high compliment from the apostle to a small church he had not been able to return to. The word was getting out that the Thessalonian’s caught the life Paul exhibited, and the gospel he proclaimed.
The church was alive and was providing proof of that life, in the midst of much affliction!
Might the affliction the Thessalonians accepted be the missing element in the church of Corinth? I will let my reader consider the difference and make up their own mind.
No matter, the Thessalonians were examples, believers who could be watched by other churches as they lived their lives, providing an example to be imitated, as others sought to follow the Lord.
A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
1 Thessalonians 1:6 And you became imitators of us and of the Lord, for you received the word in much affliction, with the joy of the Holy Spirit,
Our verse today speaks of the response of a portion of the Thessalonian populace had to the love of God becoming evident to them.
The result of a rag tag group of men, tent makers and such, entering into a synagogue and speaking of a Rabbi that rose from the dead. The began to imitate them.
To imitate. The Greek used in this verse (and the following) is μιμητής mimētḗs. In only one of the six times the apostles used this exhortation, was the subject of imitation only God.
1 Corinthians 4:16 I urge you, then, be imitators of me. 1 Corinthians 11:1 Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ. Ephesians 5:1 Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children. 1 Thessalonians 2:14 ESV – For you, brothers, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea. For you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, Hebrews 6:12 ESV – so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.
Five of the six times saints were directed to imitate, the subject were saints or apostles. This is illuminating, for we often hear the battle cry “I only follow Jesus”, or “I only trust and follow God”. The Word is rife with commands, exhortations and instruction that we are to follow God and not man, and yet we see the apostles exhort believers, or at least describe believers as those who imitate, or follow them.
This is quite audacious.
Should we expect the same today? Are there men and women that follow so closely that we could (or should) see them as worthy of following in their shadows, imitate a lifestyle that would honor God.
That is a big question, and one that I believe Paul provides additional guidance on for the modern saint.
Let’s track with what Paul is saying.
They followed / imitated Paul in much affliction. These folks didn’t see a man teaching on the “Best Life Now” and then decided they wanted immediate gratification, or a man teaching they had influence over God, that they could demand things from an all powerful God to splurge on they own self interests.
They followed in the midst of affliction.
Now, the term affliction is a very interesting word. When I first tripped over this word in my studies years back, I couldn’t help but speak it out load. θλῖψις thlîpsis. It is a rare word to have the “thl” sound, and I couldn’t help myself from saying out loud as I walked about. But enough of my idiosyncracies!
Thlîpsis speaks of pressure. Oppression, affliction, tribulation, distress, straits and of a pressing together.
It is a force outside of our lives that is causing discomfort, pain and stress. It is not stress. Let me, for a short moment, try to explain the difference, from a strictly physical point of view.
Consider an inanimate object, sitting on a table. At one point, a large mass is laid on this object. This mass is a foreign object that is affecting the object. The effect of this mass on the object is the pressure we speak of. The reaction of the object to this mass is what we define as stress (or strain, but that is another topic). Stress may be developed as a reaction of the object to the mass being applied to the object.
Say the object is a brick and the mass is a feather. Internal within the brick a very minor stress is developed. Let’s go the opposite extreme for the sake of ridiculousness. Say the object is a marshmallow, and the mass is a concrete block. After massive deformation, and due to no internal strength in the marshmallow, we can conclude that the internal strength of the marshmallow is insignificant. Deformation was the reaction to the pressure applied to the marshmallow, giving us evidence of the internal strength of the marshmallow.
So let’s recap. These folks followed Paul, in the midst of pressure, showing evidence of an internal strength that was able to withstand being “deformed” back to their previous lifestyle. The pressure may have become quite intense, but the strength within the believers was equal to the task.
My question to you, my dear reader, is what was that inner strength? The passage speaks of the inner strength, and I would suggest Paul makes it clearly evident of the inner strength these folks relied upon.
Note that Paul speaks of these believers receiving affliction, accepting pressure with the joy of the Holy Spirit. He doesn’t describe their internal strength as being a moral fortitude, a righteous anger, or a holy determination. The strength these folks had received was joy. Joy of the Holy Spirit.
These believers seem to have resisted the forces being applied to their lives by the joy of the Holy Spirit. Make no mistake, the forces applied to these believers intended to deform these new believers into a “shape” they desired, a shape that was comfortable and malleable, usable for those who did not believe.
The joy of the Holy Spirit provided these men and women the strength to resist the deformation the world wanted!
Now, back to the big question about who to imitate.
Do you know someone in your life who is following in the midst of affliction, expressing the sacrificial love of God, even to those who despise and hate him or her. They may be doing something right, and he may be a great example to imitate.
Those who tickle your ears with promises of prosperity, success, health and wealth. They may be the ones who demand your loyalty, but it may be wise to consider why you should follow them as opposed to any other false teacher.
It seems we as believers have two choices. Either we follow those who provide (empty) promises or those who warn of earthly pressures.
Which preacher appeals to you?
What message are you looking for?
Where do you find inner strength?
What pressure are you experiencing, in which the joy of the Holy Spirit is providing strength to resist deformation?
Or have you listened to that popular message, allowing deformation as an acceptable reaction to trials or troubles?
Nehemiah 8:10 …And do not be grieved, for the joy of the LORD is your strength.”
A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
1 Thessalonians 1:5 because our gospel came to you not only in word, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction. You know what kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake.
In our last posting, I intentionally did not address the last sentence in the verse, since I anticipate it to carry a message worthy of it’s own consideration.
1 Thessalonians 1:5B …You know what kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake.
At first glance, Paul seems to divert from his message of the Thessalonians new life, by speaking of his teams behavior among them.
I am not convinced this is a diversion, for he will refer to his witness among them a number of times in the letter, giving weight to the importance of the saint having not only a verbal message, but a life witness that speaks the same.
In our very next verse, Paul speaks of the impact of his physical witness, of his actions, and not simply agreeing to facts, precious as they are.
1 Thessalonians 1:6 And you became imitators of us and of the Lord….
Notice that Paul spoke of imitation, not simply agreeing with him and his team. It wasn’t as if they had a debate and some in the audience gave mental assent to the argument provided. They imitated the apostle and those of his team. This implies very strongly that these folks had watched the apostolic team in their actions, had interacted with them in their decision making process, had watched them work and toil as they stayed in the city, and had been rejected by the populace.
Next chapter, Paul again speaks of sharing his life with them, and not simply his mental and spiritual understanding of the mysteries of God. He emphasizes his life with them.
1 Thessalonians 2:8 So, being affectionately desirous of you, we were ready to share with you not only the gospel of God but also our own selves, because you had become very dear to us.
Paul again raises the topic of the importance of sharing the lives of the team with those they ministered to. Paul and his team were living out the gospel message, and the motivation of love was driving them to an open expression of life to the Thessalonians.
To be painfully honest, I can not imagine this environment was a typical church service type of situation, where Paul got up in front of the audience, provided a monologue of doctrine, and then went home until Wednesday night prayer meeting. In my mind’s eye, I can imagine a dialogue type of environment, where Paul spoke of personal experiences of the truth of the gospel directing his actions, with the resultant impacts, successes and disappointments being shared with those in his presence. He was with them, and seemingly an open book for them to read!
1 Thessalonians 4:1 Finally, then, brothers, we ask and urge you in the Lord Jesus, that as you received from us how you ought to walk and to please God, just as you are doing, that you do so more and more.
Paul pleads with the Thessalonians to remember their witness amongst them, that they walk as the apostle and his team walked, (not just thought as the apostles team thought), and to continue to please God.
This witness of Paul, in combination with the preaching of the Word, impacted these Thessalonians to the point where they repented of their ways, turned to Christ and pleased God.
Remember, Paul was amongst them for less than 21 days, and they saw enough to be convinced of the message, turning from idols and growing into Christians.
Truly amazing!
Who was your “Paul”? Did you have someone you could watch live the Christian life? Someone who did more than provide a message, a critical message, but also backed that message up with their own life, a sacrifice for others?
How about your life? Is it reflective of the Master, and is there enough there to make a difference in someone else, someone who has just heard and believed the good news of Jesus?
A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
1 Thessalonians 1:5 because our gospel came to you not only in word, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction. You know what kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake.
In our last verse we spoke of the election of the Thessalonians, and of my refocused understanding of that particular verse. As a reminder, it is all about the love of God, not the choosing of us, whatever that may mean to my reader.
It is the love of God that is so importance for us to remember!
In verse 5, Paul will remind the saints of Thessalonica why he makes such a claim as in verse 5.
Why Can Paul Say this
Paul made a bold claim in verse 5, speaking of God choosing the Thessalonians, and more importantly of the love of God these saints (and all saints!) have possessed in their lives.
He now enters into a short passage that provides for us the reason he makes such a claim of their lives being the recipients of the love of God.
Word
Paul, with his team came into the town of Thessalonica, with a message. That message was delivered verbally, to all the people hearing them, through a teaching that all in the audience heard. Yet for these called out people, for these chosen folks, that message became a message of life. They recognized truth and it became a message to be trusted.
Think of that. Vibrations from the apostles throat entered into the audience’s ears, a series of ideas were offered to those who listened, and some of those listening acknowledged the truth of the message.
The word, or the message delivered to these folks became a fact that they accepted. It was not merely a claim that was developed and offered without consideration, but the message became factual for them, and for those who accepted it, it was the foundational factual truth of the life they now lived in.
Now some may say that their choice simply became the Thessalonian’s truth, as the common argument in todays culture. You know how those who reject the gospel will excuse their position. “If it works for you that is great”, or “everyone has their personal truth.”
Absolute truth exists. The grave is empty. Those who recognize this truth make it their truth, but not in the manner of denigrating this message to a personal preference. The gospel is factual, and these people recognized it and “joined the party!”
Power
For the message came to these people, and they recognized the truth of a resurrected man who is God Almighty. Upon this realization, the power of God was unleashed in their lives. The facts became energized. The message and the power were delivered simultaneously.
It is very interesting that the word “power” in this Greek term δύναμις dýnamis speaks of inherent power, power that resides in itself, that the nature of the gospel exerts authority, the message has power resident within it.
Paul is speaking of the Word being accepted by the hearer, and at the same time of the power resident in the message impacting the audience.
As you may know, I sometimes chase rabbits, but for this post I will simply offer a thought experiment. Did the power resident in the gospel impact those who rejected it? We know it did with the saints!
Holy Spirit
Here is the person of the message and the power.
A short witness of my history regarding the Spirit of God. Many years ago, as I was struggling with understanding the message of the charismatic movement, a dear brother once quipped that the Holy Spirit is the silent member of the Trinity. By saying this he was referring to the relative number of time the Word of God speaks of the Holy Spirit being referred to in the Word. He did not intend to communicate, as far as I understood, that the Holy Spirit did not communicate to God’s people. It was just that the communication the Spirit of God provided was to glorify Jesus, not Himself.
Consider
John 15:26 “But when the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me.
As I have sought to understand and follow Jesus, many distractions and tripping opportunities have been provided to me. When the Spirit of God reminds me of Jesus and His life, His teaching, His authority, His resurrection, His glory and His love, I am confident in the message is from the Spirit of God. There are many who seek a following, both man and spirit, but it is the Spirit of God that provides the life and teaching of Jesus in a living way to believers as they seek to honor God.
It is truly an amazing life to live, a life that is not dependent on me being good, but on listening and accepting the truth of His goodness, and out of a heart of thankfulness and wonder worshipping such a great Messiah.
2 Corinthians 3:18 And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit.
He will change us as we look to Him!
It is a common understanding that what/who we worship is what type of people we eventually become. For the believer, the Spirit of God provides us the day to day message of the Messiah, of His worthiness and His ministry in our lives. To worship the Living God is to become more and more like Him in His loving, self sacrificing nature, of His commitment to truth, for He is the Truth, and of His resurrecting power that is the core of our faith.
Much Assurance
Assurance. First off, may I suggest that assurance and security are two different concepts.
Security, specifically eternal security in relation to our faith is a topic that I have discussed on this blog numerous times since 2019. For a sampling of passages I have addressed, consider Conditional Security – Passage List.
Regarding assurance, may I suggest that assurance in a continuing work of the Spirit. February 19th of 1981, as I bowed my knee and confessed my sin, The Spirit of God provided me assurance of salvation by the Risen Lord. Surety of salvation was real, to the point I was willing to enter a building on fire to help someone if trapped. (If I haven’t told the story, and any are interested, let me know.)
As I have faltered and failed through my walk with Him, my assurance ebbed and flowed also. As I focused on my own abilities, needs, wants and desires, I found my assurance waned also. As I refocused on the Messiah, and centered on Him, I found my assurance being reestablished based on His abilities and not my own.
Assurance is an obedience issue. On the other hand, security, (that is eternal security), may sometimes become for the believer a crutch to depend on, understanding that the initial faith in the Messiah is a binding contract between God and the “believer”. Eternal Security may even an opportunity to avoid the Word of the Savior, thinking that refusal of obeying will only cost a crown in heaven and not the entrance to it.
My friend, if you are of the persuasion of the OSAS teaching, that is of the Once Saved Always Saved thinking, be sure you test it, as the apostle directs us later in this letter.
1 Thessalonians 5:21 but test everything; hold fast what is good.
Do not, as I have in my previous experience, depend a select number of verses without considering the opposing view. Be diligent in your study, and face difficult passages that will challenge your current thinking. Our faith is a life of repentance, not only in moral issues, but also in our understanding of the ways of God.
Nevertheless, in each of our understandings of the message of the gospel, we are to look to Him for all things, encourage those we come in contact with, and exhort those who are claiming a faith they are not living.
He is the One we are to look to and it is from the Spirit of God that we will receive the direction we so desperately need to honor the Father!
A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
1 Thessalonians 1:4 For we know, brothers loved by God, that he has chosen you,
Election. To be chosen.
There is a large portion of the Christian body that focuses on this term and develops a logical construction of the process of salvation with the help of this term.
I have spent much of my time as a believer deep in this teaching, defending the doctrine, all in an effort to promote the faith, to maintain the true gospel and to provide comfort and encouragement to those who have not found the truth.
In this teaching called Calvinism, I emphasized the need to believe the logical construction of the five points of Calvinism, in order to provide an eternal security to the believer. If you have been with me for any period of time, you will have come to know that this teaching has been found wanting in my mind and heart as I have aged, and that security in Jesus is found in the person of God and not a contract that I depended on 40 some odd years ago.
Yes I depended on that night in 1981 as my key to heaven, instead of the Living Christ!
The verse we are addressing this morning is one of seven verses that use the term “chosen” ἐκλογή eklogḗ. The full list of this specific word follows.
In our verse today, it is apparent that the evidence of the choosing by God of these Thessalonians is described in the next verse, and we shall develop that thought in our next post. For the verse today, let us consider the motivation of God in His choosing the Thessalonians at the time of Paul’s visit.
Loved by God
In this verse we have one verb. Simple. One action word by which Paul is trying to communicate to these people a message of comfort and encouragement. The verb is not “to choose” or “chosen”, but beloved.
This is the heart of the verse, and here our focus should rightly settle. As we get into our next verse, Paul will indicate that these people understood the love of God, and that Paul reminded them of God’s choosing of them by the evidence of their actions.
I do not understand Paul to be teaching an us / them scenario, in which he calls out believers as more special, or better than those who did not believe. He simply reminds them of the love of God they experienced, and of the proof of this through the actions they took.
Consider – Might there be some interplay between the love of God and the decisions/actions these believers entered into that exhibited the truth of their faith to Paul? Is Paul letting them know that based on the power of the Spirit in their lives and their steel convictions, it is evident they are children of God.
My friends, as I ventured into the logical reasonings of Calvinism – and it is logical! , I found I fell into a fatalism, a thinking (rightly or wrongly – I cannot tell) that caused a hardening in my heart, an indifference to those outside the faith.
In my focusing on my election, I fell into the rut of thinking “They weren’t chosen but I was”. Whatever evangelistic tone in my life morphed into a analytical defense of a teaching that created an us/them thinking. Are we to discern truth by the effect it has on our lives? I would argue that any teaching that hardens us to others is not the spirit of the Friend of Sinners!
This is my testimony, and I do not claim it to be anything other than my testimony, but to follow after the logical reasoning that in time past God chose me to be saved created questions I couldn’t grapple with, thoughts that limited God and froze me up.
But God loves me, a sinner and rebel that is weak, blind and crippled. He has provided a Savior that constantly provides blessing and gladness in spite of my history, my failings and my self love. His love is to be the Banner over our lives, not a teaching that creates questions, provides mysteries and borrows from a logical thought process of the ancients.
As mentioned above, I have walked away from a contractual perspective of Christianity, finding that security may be best, and I believe, only be found in the person of the Christ. As the believer seeks to follow the Messiah, we find that He provides the comfort, encouragement, strength, challenge and guidance for a daily walk.
To know Him and to follow Him is to have and gain an internal security that settles in the heart, as opposed to an eternal security based on a decision in some past point in time.
The decision to trust Christ is the start of a continual life adventure that is full of challenge, rife with repentance, and with abounding comfort and He ministers to His people.
He is so good. He loves us! Spend your day focusing on the great love of God, and His continued blessing in your life.
May God be honored in our lives by our remembering His great love to us!
A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
1 Thessalonians 1:3 remembering before our God and Father your work of faith and labor of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ.
Let’s remember that this letter to the Thessalonians is the first of Paul’s many letters to churches and individuals that have become identified as Scripture.
In his career as an apostle, Paul would end up writing at least 13 books of the 27 in the New Testament.
Those books would be Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, and Philemon. I did not add Hebrews to the list as there is disagreement over the author of Hebrews!
I mention this fact due to the multiple times we will trip over seed thoughts of Paul’s in relation to the Christian life, church truths, end time discussions and general direction for the believer in this letter to the fledgling church.
Such is the case in this verse. The triad of Christian virtues is laid out for us in this verse.
Faith love and hope. It turns out that this was a very present theme on Paul’s mind and heart as he aged through the Christian life. Here we find the seed thought in 1 Thessalonians – twice, for he speaks of this again in 1 Thessalonians 5:8 but it is expanded for us in 1 Corinthians.
He doesn’t provide the expansion as he does in 1 Corinthians, but let us consider each on thier own.
Work of Faith
Faith without works is dead. James would coin that phrase for the church to be challenged by years later as he wrote his letter, but the truth for our ears was spoken by the apostle, the apostle of grace, the same apostle who wrote that by grace we are saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God.
We often consider faith to be an internal gift from God, and for many we gravitate to verses such as Romans 3:28 to support the sense that faith is apart from works, as spoken by the same apostle Paul.
Romans 3:28 For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law.
How are we to relieve the tension between faith apart from works, and the work of faith?
Consider that the work of faith springs from a faith that was from works. The order is critical, and the work of faith is simply the response of the believer to the tremendous grace Jesus Christ has offered us.
To those who believe not, but are considering following the Master, a word of note. If you truly believe, if you truly repent and believe, you will receive life, an amazing life, and from that life you will desire to know Him first, and to serve Him always. The natural outcome of knowing His will be to produce a work of faith as the Thessalonians did.
LAbor of Love
Again, Paul settles on the concept of work, or labor. A different word here though. As the word “work” in our previous clause was the Greek word ἔργον érgon, meaning to toil or to work, our verb “labor” is κόπος kópos, and it brings into the message the idea of intense labor combined with trouble, or even in combination with a beating, or the voluntary acceptance of trials and pain in the work.
Will not love drive you beyond the efforts your would expend for a simple paycheck, even for a distant friend? To Labor is to push yourself, sacrifice your time, treasure and talent for the sake of someone else, maybe even an enemy. This is so reminiscent of the Master Himself, for He labored for us.
Steadfastness of hope
As I lay in bed this morning, my mind wandered onto this verse and prior studies I ventured into years back. For you see, this steadfastness is a word I have looked at previously and found it to be fascinating.
For those who are interested in the concept of patience and endurance, I spent a period of time considering the concept and its importance in the Christian life in an 8 part series titled Patience. The first in the series is Patience – A Component of Hope
The term is our verse is ὑπομονή hupŏmŏnē, and speaks of a cheerful endurance, a “stick to itiveness” that is not dismayed by trials or tribulations. The term literally means to “remain under”, for the Greek word is made up of “hypo”, meaning under, and “meno”, meaning to remain. To remain under. When pressure becomes intolerable, remain under. When other’s walk away from the faith, remain under. When all the world is yelling at you to concede, or to give up, remain under. Be patient. Endure. Stay the course.
Though I spoke of a “stick to itiveness” above, this characteristic we are to exercise has an object of motivation. It is not simply a “grind your teeth and bear it” type of mentality, a state of stubbornness, but a standing of hope, or of expectation. It isn’t to be fueled by a stubborn heart, a heart that refuses to move out of shear pride.
This abiding under pressures or trials is to be maintained because of the One who led the way. He has endured, “stayed under” the suffering of the cross, for the joy that was set before Him.
Hebrews 12:2-3 looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God. Consider him who endured from sinners such hostility against himself, so that you may not grow weary or fainthearted.
Is not the hope we have that we will experience joy in the future. Our hope is the amazing future ahead, to know Him better, to be with Him in the future. This hope is the anchor that motivates us to “stay under” to remain for His sake.
May the Lord give us the heart of expectation, that we may stand our ground with joy, to “stay under the pressure” and be faithful unto death.
A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
1 Thessalonians 1:2 We give thanks to God always for all of you, constantly mentioning you in our prayers,
We ended our last verse with grace and peace being conferred onto the church in Thessalonica. This verse is the expression of an Apostles heart to God for the fledgling church he had to leave behind.
Pauls second missionary journey, in which he was instrumental in the birth of this church, was between 49 & 51 AD. His second journey took him through the following cities, planting the life of Christ wherever he could.
Antioch
Syria
Cilicia
Derbe
Lystra
Phrygia
Galatia
Troas
Phillipi
Samothrace
Neopolis
Amphipolis
Thessalonica – 15 days
Berea
Athens
Corinth – 18 months
Ephesus
Caesarea
Antioch
I provide this list to indicate that during the second missionary journey of Paul, which lasted less than 4 years, he didn’t get to Thessalonica until possibly the second year, maybe the third year of the trip. Being in Corinth and sending the letter meant that it was very little time between when he left the church and when he wrote to them. Chronologies of Paul’s journey’s suggest less than a year between the planting of the church and the first letter to them.
Paul missed the church of Thessalonica.
Remember the life of an apostle, especially in Corinth, where he labored on his own and preached during the time he wasn’t working. Paul was a man of much energy and with a drive that would not shut off. Corinth was exploding and he may have felt this was the success he missed out on elsewhere. If it had been myself, the tendency would be to focus on the success.
Paul loved the church of Thessalonica.
Paul was thankful To God
It is good to remember that Paul thanked God for the church, and not the church for believing the gospel. This may seem like a “splitting of hairs”, but consider the difference.
To be thankful to God is to find the source of the blessing, the source of the life, the source of the life, to direct thanks to. Yes the church believed, but the Lord is the One to be thankful to for not only the message and the power of the message, but the guidance to the town, the interest of the adherents, and the continued faithfulness of God in leading this church, even as Paul was missing.
Yes it is wise, and right to be thankful to God. To be thankful to our those we rub shoulders with is a blessing, for us and to them, and is not to be discounted. Yet in the final analysis, thankfulness, true thankfulness is to be directed to God.
Paul was thankful For All
Ok. We are to be thankful to God. Got it. Paul says for all. Even that saint that gossips, or is lazy and entitled, those that are fear mongers and busy bodies. Yes our churches are full of these type, and though Paul did not have to face these folk on a daily, or even weekly basis, he was thankful to God for ALL.
As we go through this letter to a church that had up to 12 months of life together in Jesus, Paul brings to the front certain issues that are of concern. He knows there are those who are not pulling their weight, that are going around spreading gossip, or spreading false hope. Problems, but he will get to the granularity of the church soon enough. For now, he is expressing his thankfulness to God for all the church, each saint no matter their maturity or dedication.
For us, we are involved day to day with those we have been joined to through Christ and we seen the issues, (though not our own!) Be thankful for those you worship with, for those you study with, for those you serve with, for those you mourn with and for those you rejoice with.
Nothing destroys a family faster than an unthankful heart to God.
Romans 1:21 For although they knew God, they did not …. give thanks to him….
There is an option for the believer!
Colossians 3:15b …be thankful.
After all, to be thankful is a command, and that means we can (and should) exercise a thankful spirit unto God our Savior
A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
1 Thessalonians 1:1 Paul, Silvanus, and Timothy, To the church of the Thessalonians in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace to you and peace.
Three men. A simple greeting to a group of people that they barely knew.
These men arrived uninvited, interrupted their lives and vanished. When I say they interrupted their lives, I mean it in only in the most drastic way.
This group of people, I assume, were peaceful, law abiding folk, seeking to know about the God of Israel, for they were adherents to the synagogue Paul and his ruffians entered. After only one message, hearts started changing. One message my friend. No extended argument or debate – the message struck hard and deep, with such force that those who resisted it resorted to violence. How pitiful.
For those who believed, they were under instant resistance, enduring much affliction, as we will read in a later verse. Two sabbaths later, Paul and his buddies are gone.
Now what? No one to guide or encourage. Very minimal teaching has been provided, when compared to other churches that had been started. Some of the churches had Paul as a teaching apostle for years!
Not the Thessalonians. Two weeks, maybe three and they had been effectively abandoned.
Abandoned by those three men, not out of want, but forced to move on. Abandoned if they had placed their faith in the apostles. Yet the church soldiered on, exhibiting faith love and hope. They had caught the message of the resurrected Savior and were moving on with it.
Paul expressed three wishes or prayers for this fledgling church.
Grace
That which is partnered with joy, delight, loving kindness, favor, bounty and benefit. For grace to be provided means the recipients are the benefactors of Another, and that is Paul’s prayer, not that they may receive it, but that they realize they have it.
Grace is a merciful kindness to those recipients, a full dose of the sweetness and gentleness of God to a needy people.
Peace
Peace is not the absence of violence. Peace is not the absence of war, although there may be a link.
Peace in the first century spoke of a wholeness of life, of a harmony within and between people and God. There can be national peace – that is no war between nations, and yet the turmoil and upheaval inside a soul can be devastating. Let us not reduce peace to a simple visual understanding of actions of violence.
Peace is a tranquil state of the soul, even in the midst of uncertainty and upheaval. This is the Thessalonians state, for they lived amongst those who erupted their city for the sake of quelling the small group from advancing. They were, in their enemies minds, worthy of destruction.
And Paul sends peace.
Grace and peace from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, in whom it is obvious these folks followed!
A little while ago, I produced a verse by verse series in Philippians. I really enjoyed that exercise and have been wondering if I should take on another book. Well it turns out that 1 Thessalonians is the victim of my machinations, and hopefully, the thoughts produced by this fantastic book will edify and encourage the reader.
As with Philippians I am going to limit each post to one verse, and hopefully produce a short, succinct read for my friends who follow.
A little background before we dig into this letter from Paul. It is a precious letter in that it is the first of Paul’s letters to the churches he founded and directed, so we may see in this writing, many seed thoughts he develops in messages to other churches.
So a bit of background.
The Thessalonian church was birthed after the Philippian church, quickly and under very stressful circumstances.
You see, Paul would always go to the cities where there was a synagogue (with the exception of Philippi) to reason first with those who had background in the Old Testament. It was a logical place to spread the Word since it seems so obvious that the Messiah Jesus was the fulfillment of all the prophecies scattered throughout the Old Testament.
But there was resistance! The most ungodly of resistance erupted, those who hate God and despise any mention of our Lord. You may assume it was some humanists, or antichrist movement. It turns out that the resistance Paul experienced in the city of Thessalonica was of the Jews. A bit surprising when I first read that years ago.
And you may ask – How did they cause resistance? Violence. They used violence in an effort to quell the preaching of the gospel.
Acts 17:5 But the Jews were jealous, and taking some wicked men of the rabble, they formed a mob, set the city in an uproar, and attacked the house of Jason, seeking to bring them out to the crowd.
As an aside, it seems obvious that if violence is the first method of taking out a new way of thinking, those unleashing the violence obviously cannot win the debate, or provide an appeal for their adherents to remain. To be violent is a sign of weakness, a sign of the inability to provide cogent arguments against the opposing view. But this is the Jews only option, for who can argue against a man who rose from the dead?
It turns out that due to this violence, Paul and Silas moved on to the next city after only 3 Sabbaths. This could be as little as 15 days, and out of that 15 days, a church was born, and the life of Christ began spreading throughout the city!
Acts 17:7 and Jason has received them (the apostles), and they are all acting against the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king, Jesus.”
The life of Christ began, but the opposition did not stop.
Note the earthly wisdom of the Jews. They knew they had no chance in the arena of religion, so they went political, spreading the news of Jesus being the King. Nothing like some competition for the ruling class to get up in arms over it. And get up in arms they did, for though they did not restrain the apostles, they did get hold of a fellow named Jason, who provided shelter for the apostles. How dare he!
As government often does, they will threaten some judgement on a traitor, for if Jason is following another king, he is a traitor to the king before! Note the solution to this “traitorous” activity of Jason, is to fine Jason. Money. An opportunity to make (or take?) a buck. Kinda sad, for the Jews had influenced an arm of the government to exercise a desired discipline, but it turns out the government was satisfied with a couple of bucks.
Nevertheless, Paul and his helpers made a huge impact on this city, and though Paul never returned, this letter from him holds many truths believers find comfort and challenge in.
I hope during our journey through Paul’s first letter to the Thessalonians, we can find up to date applications for the believers life in the here and now.
As considered in my introduction to this series, I would like to look at each of the letters to the churches of Revelation from a different viewpoint than I have had much of my life.
Much could be written on each of the churches, but my intent is to give an overview of Old Testament motifs and pictures that John may have drew on from the Old Testament when he was penning the letters through the Holy Spirit
Our seventh and final letter is to the Church of Laodicea
John reaches back into the last days of Israel for this church. At the risk of being too specific, this may refer to that last generation prior to the fall of Israel in 70 AD.
Lets read the passage to get our thoughts aligned.
Rev 3:14-22
“And to the angel of the church in Laodicea write: ‘The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of God’s creation. “‘I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth. For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing, not realizing that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked. I counsel you to buy from me gold refined by fire, so that you may be rich, and white garments so that you may clothe yourself and the shame of your nakedness may not be seen, and salve to anoint your eyes, so that you may see. Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline, so be zealous and repent. Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me. The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’”
Consider the following
Wealth and self sufficiency was a fitting description for pharisaical Israel of the last days. (Luke 18:9-14)
The nation of Israel was about to be “spewed out” of the land in fulfillment of the curse (Lev 18:24-28, Luke 21:24)
Israel is urged to repent and accept Jesus as Messiah.
Overcomers are promised the blessing of ruling with the Messiah, as the New Covenant promise was originally given to the people of Israel
Give me your thoughts. Do you see parallels I have missed? Let me know in the comments. I would love to hear from you.
As considered in my introduction to this series, I would like to look at each of the letters to the churches of Revelation from a different viewpoint than I have had much of my life.
Much could be written on each of the churches, but my intent is to give an overview of Old Testament motifs and pictures that John may have drew on from the Old Testament when he was penning the letters through the Holy Spirit
Our sixth letter is to the Church of Philadelphia
John reaches back into the return from exile under Ezra and Nehemiah for this church. Lets read the passage to get our thoughts aligned.
Rev 3:7-13.
“And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write: ‘The words of the holy one, the true one, who has the key of David, who opens and no one will shut, who shuts and no one opens. “‘I know your works. Behold, I have set before you an open door, which no one is able to shut. I know that you have but little power, and yet you have kept my word and have not denied my name. Behold, I will make those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie–behold, I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you. Because you have kept my word about patient endurance, I will keep you from the hour of trial that is coming on the whole world, to try those who dwell on the earth. I am coming soon. Hold fast what you have, so that no one may seize your crown. The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God. Never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’
Consider the following
An imagery of a synagogue / temple is given in this passage
The Jews of this period had a “little power”, as the church is described.
The open door speaks of the opportunity granted the exilic Jews to follow, along with this churches opportunity.
The synagogue of Satan may speak of parallels with the false Jews referred to during the time of Nehemiah’s rebuilding program. (Nehemiah 4, 6 and 13)
A coming time of testing, to test those who dwell on the land, may speak of Daniel 8 and 11, and of the tribulation of Antiochus Epiphanes
The overcomer will be made a pillar in the temple
The overcomer will share the blessings of the New Jerusalem
Give me your thoughts. Do you see parallels I have missed? Let me know in the comments. I would love to hear from you
As considered in my introduction to this series, I would like to look at each of the letters to the churches of Revelation from a different viewpoint than I have had much of my life.
Much could be written on each of the churches, but my intent is to give an overview of Old Testament motifs and pictures that John may have drew on from the Old Testament when he was penning the letters through the Holy Spirit
Our fifth letter is to the Church of Sardis
John reaches back into the later prophetic period of Israel’s history for this church. Lets read the passage to get our thoughts aligned.
Rev 3:1-6
“And to the angel of the church in Sardis write: ‘The words of him who has the seven spirits of God and the seven stars. “‘I know your works. You have the reputation of being alive, but you are dead. Wake up, and strengthen what remains and is about to die, for I have not found your works complete in the sight of my God. Remember, then, what you received and heard. Keep it, and repent. If you will not wake up, I will come like a thief, and you will not know at what hour I will come against you. Yet you have still a few names in Sardis, people who have not soiled their garments, and they will walk with me in white, for they are worthy. The one who conquers will be clothed thus in white garments, and I will never blot his name out of the book of life. I will confess his name before my Father and before his angels. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’
Consider the following
The Angel speaks of the seven spirits and seven stars, reaching back to a witness by the prophets speaking by the Spirit of God
A remnant is referred to often in the prophets writing during this time (Isaiah 1:5-23, 6:9-13, 65:8-16, Jeremiah 7:1-7, 8:11-12)
Imminent judgement on this church is declared, as with the pre-exilic prophets message (Isaiah 1:24-31, 2:12-21, 26:20-21, Jeremiah 4:5-31, 7:12-15, 11:9-13.)
Give me your thoughts. Do you see parallels I have missed? Let me know in the comments. I would love to hear from you.
As considered in my introduction to this series, I would like to look at each of the letters to the churches of Revelation from a different viewpoint than I have had much of my life.
Much could be written on each of the churches, but my intent is to give an overview of Old Testament motifs and pictures that John may have drew on from the Old Testament when he was penning the letters through the Holy Spirit
Our fourth letter is to the Church of Thyatira
John reaches back into period of Israelite monarchy for this church. Lets read the passage to get our thoughts aligned.
Rev 2:18-29
“And to the angel of the church in Thyatira write: ‘The words of the Son of God, who has eyes like a flame of fire, and whose feet are like burnished bronze. “‘I know your works, your love and faith and service and patient endurance, and that your latter works exceed the first. But I have this against you, that you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants to practice sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols. I gave her time to repent, but she refuses to repent of her sexual immorality. Behold, I will throw her onto a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her I will throw into great tribulation, unless they repent of her works, and I will strike her children dead. And all the churches will know that I am he who searches mind and heart, and I will give to each of you according to your works. But to the rest of you in Thyatira, who do not hold this teaching, who have not learned what some call the deep things of Satan, to you I say, I do not lay on you any other burden. Only hold fast what you have until I come. The one who conquers and who keeps my works until the end, to him I will give authority over the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron, as when earthen pots are broken in pieces, even as I myself have received authority from my Father. And I will give him the morning star. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.’
Consider the following
Christ is introduced as the Son of God (Ps 2:7, 89:19-37, Jer 30:9, Ezek 34:23-24, 37:24-28, Hos 3:5)
Jezebel is referred to and rebuked in both this period and this church (1 Kings 16:29-34, 21:25-26)
Tribulation is threated upon both Jezebels (1 Kings 17:1, James 5:17)
Both will loose their lives and their offspring (2 Kings 9:22-37)
Overcomers, like David, will be granted authority over nations (2 Sam 7:19, 8:14)
The final promise for overcomers reaches back to Ps 2:9
Give me your thoughts. Do you see parallels I have missed? Let me know in the comments. I would love to hear from you.
As considered in my introduction to this series, I would like to look at each of the letters to the churches of Revelation from a different viewpoint than I have had much of my life.
Much could be written on each of the churches, but my intent is to give an overview of Old Testament motifs and pictures that John may have drew on from the Old Testament when he was penning the letters through the Holy Spirit
Our third letter is to the Church of Pergamum
John reaches back into the travails of Israel in the wilderness for this church. Lets read the passage to get our thoughts aligned.
Rev 2:12-17 “And to the angel of the church in Pergamum write: ‘The words of him who has the sharp two-edged sword. “‘I know where you dwell, where Satan’s throne is. Yet you hold fast my name, and you did not deny my faith even in the days of Antipas my faithful witness, who was killed among you, where Satan dwells. But I have a few things against you: you have some there who hold the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the sons of Israel, so that they might eat food sacrificed to idols and practice sexual immorality. So also you have some who hold the teaching of the Nicolaitans. Therefore repent. If not, I will come to you soon and war against them with the sword of my mouth. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who conquers I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, with a new name written on the stone that no one knows except the one who receives it.’
Consider the following
Pergamum dwells amongst demons, reminding us of Israel’s travels passing through the abode of demons (Lev. 16:10, 17:7, Deut 8:15)
Pergamum’s enemies are described as Balak and Balaam. (Num 25:1-3, 31:16)
Christ will make war against Balaamites with a sword in like manner as the angel of the Lord and Phineas (Numbers 22:31, 24:7-8)
To the overcomers, a promise of hidden manna (Heb 9:4) and a new name on a white stone, speaking of the redeemed people represented on the High Priest clothing (Ex 28:9-12). Note the stone for Pergamum is white, speaking of purity.
Give me your thoughts. Do you see parallels I have missed? Let me know in the comments. I would love to hear from you
As considered in my introduction to this series, I would like to look at each of the letters to the churches of Revelation from a different viewpoint than I have had much of my life.
Much could be written on each of the churches, but my intent is to give an overview of Old Testament motifs and pictures that John may have drew on from the Old Testament when he was penning the letters through the Holy Spirit
Our second letter is to the Church of Smyrna
John reaches back into the patriarchs (Abraham – Joseph and the children of Israel) for this church. Lets read the passage to get our thoughts aligned.
Rev 2:8-11
“And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write: ‘The words of the first and the last, who died and came to life. “‘I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich) and the slander of those who say that they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. Do not fear what you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and for ten days you will have tribulation. Be faithful unto death, and I will give you the crown of life. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who conquers will not be hurt by the second death.’
Consider the following
Jesus is as one who was dead and is alive, with the foreshadowing of a number of stories
Isaac’s picture of the resurrection (Gen 22:1-14)
Joseph’s picture of the resurrection (Gen 37:18-36, 39:20 – 41:45, 45:4-8, 50:20, Heb 11:17-19)
Israel’s salvation from bondage of Egypt
The church is described as poor yet being rich is similar to Abraham and his family as they lived as aliens in the land of promise
Persecution of true Jews by false Jews as Isaac was persecuted by Ismael (Gen 21:9)
The threat of imprisonment via slander mirrors Joseph’s experience in the house of Potiphar (Gen 39:13-20)
The blessing of the crown of life for the faithful is pictured (Gen 41:40-44)
Aaron wore a crown of life, (Ex 28:36-38) picturing the fully redeemed man
Israel’s victory through ten plagues echoes the tribulation of ten days before Israel’s deliverance
Give me your thoughts. Do you see parallels I have missed? Let me know in the comments. I would love to hear from you
In oversimplified terms, universal reconciliation speaks of the eventual redemption of every soul ever created through the work of the Messiah and His sacrifice on the cross. This teaching does not remove the existence of hell, or the suffering associated with it, but it does challenge it’s never ending duration, and the purpose of the flames.
This series of posts, on the book “Heaven’s Doors” will be my last on the topic of universal reconciliation (not universalism). I am thankful to my Calvinist friend for directing me to this “heresy”. The teaching of universal reconciliation has more Scriptural support than I imagined and is worth considering if you are of an open mind and willing to consider alternate views to expand your understanding of the Word.
Of course if you are convinced you are completely right, without error, and doctrinally pure, this topic would be a waste of your time. Please move on!
This post will address Judas
For the Son of Man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man if he had not been born.” – Mark 14:21
So many questions about Judas. Was he a believer that apostatized or simply a professor that fooled everyone. Again, some of these questions are for another post, and I will restrict myself to Mr. Sarris verse reference for the sake of brevity.
To have an existence that is worse than nonexistence! Wow. That has got to be terrible.
A number of times in the Scripture, cursing one’s birth is recorded. Think of Jeremiah
Cursed be the day on which I was born! The day when my mother bore me, let it not be blessed! – Jer 20:14
Or Job
“Let the day perish on which I was born, and the night that said, ‘A man is conceived.’ – Job 3:3
You may remember others, but the point is that this is not uncommon for the Word to record this attitude. Jesus actually referred to the attitude towards Judas as being of woe, as in “woe to that man”.
Woe. What an uncommon word. When was the last time you heard this word in a conversation?
Turns out, this word (ouai) is a primary exclamation of grief.
Sorrow. Grief. Deep heartache. Sadness. Distress. Jesus was referring to sorrow, not anger. He was speaking of the pain of the decision Judas was making and of the resultant deep heartache from this action of betrayal.
So we could read it as “sorrow to this man”. But what man is experiencing the sorrow? I have always associated Judas with the sorrow, the woe.
Mr Sarris brings to our attention that Jesus, in these verses, is speaking of two people, The Son of Man and Judas. Consider the Mark 14:21 with the pronouns identified.
For the Son of Man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man (Judas) by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man (the Son of Man) if he (Judas) had not been born.” – Mark 14:21
Jesus, in this understanding of the verse, is speaking of the grief He would experience concerning Judas, his disciple who was to betray Him.
A Rambling
One other finding that may be of interest to the reader. The last phrase in the verse is translated in the ESV as…
It would have been better for that man if he had not been born.
As I look through the various translations, a number of the literal translations prefer to use “good” as opposed to better.
… good were it to him if that man had not been born.’ – Mar 14:21 YLT
… good were it for that man if he had never been born. – Mar 14:21 KJV
… [It would have been] good for that man if he had not been born.” – Mar 14:21 NASB20
… good were it for that man if he had not been born. – Mar 14:21 ASV
As an aside, there is a difference between better (which is a comparative term) and good (which is a qualitative term) So what Carl – this ain’t English class, eh? I know I know – I am not an English major and never have been, but these things sometimes tickle my mind and make think. Ok so here is what I am thinking.
“Good” for Jesus if Judas had not been born is simply a statement of negation on Judas’ life. – No life for Judas, no existence. Jesus would not have had the sorrow of his close friends betrayal
“Better” for Jesus if Judas had not been born is a comparison with something that is worse. This by implication speaks of suffering, regret, pain on top of the betrayal of his disciple.
This rambling is brought to you by a fuzzy headed writer that is offering a concept to be discussed.
Another Rambling
You know, (one more rambling coming – ) when the Lord walked amongst us, the established God ordained religion of Judaism rejected His message of inclusion, of accepting sinners and tax collectors, even non-Jews into the family of God. It was heresy, and beyond accepted religious thinking. And yet out of this “heresy”, a multinational family of saints has erupted and the expansion of the Body of Christ / the Kingdom of God is greater than any first century religious Jew may have ever expected.
Are we moderns possibly of the same ilk in our understanding of God’s wonderful mercy as the first century Jewish religion?
The body of the post is also available for discussion of course, and I would appreciate your thoughts. As this is the last post on this book, I would like to thank all who have travelled with me in this somewhat surprising book of Mr. Sarris. I thoroughly enjoyed the book and the challenges it provided my thinking. I can not say I am a convinced Universal Reconciliation adherent, but I have definitely seen reasons why some understand the Scripture to provide this hope to God’s creation.
Something to consider – Ramblings done – Thanks for reading.
As considered in my introduction to this series, I would like to look at each of the letters to the churches of Revelation from a different viewpoint than I have had much of my life.
Much could be written on each of the churches, but my intent is to give an overview of Old Testament motifs and pictures that John may have drew on from the Old Testament when he was penning the letters through the Holy Spirit
Our first letter is to the Church of the Ephesians.
John reaches back into the garden for this church. Lets read the passage to get our thoughts aligned.
Rev 2:1-7
“To the angel of the church in Ephesus write: ‘The words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand, who walks among the seven golden lampstands. “‘I know your works, your toil and your patient endurance, and how you cannot bear with those who are evil, but have tested those who call themselves apostles and are not, and found them to be false. I know you are enduring patiently and bearing up for my name’s sake, and you have not grown weary. But I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first. Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent, and do the works you did at first. If not, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent. Yet this you have: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.’
Consider the following
Christ is announced as the Creator.
Adam was granted privilege of labor in the garden, and this church has an emphasis on labor in its description
Christ walked amongst the lampstands to judge the church, as God had walked amongst His original creation in judgement (Gen 3:8).
The angel was commanded to guard the church, in similar fashion to Adam guarding the garden (Gen 2:15)
Both Adam and the angel of the church had fallen, failing in their duties.
Both Adam and the angel of the church left their first love
Christ threatens to remove the lamp from the church, even as God removed the Tree of Life from Adam and Eve’s through restricting their access to the garden
The Tree of Life was available to Adam, and now available to all who overcome.
Give me your thoughts. Do you see parallels I have missed? Let me know in the comments. I would love to hear from you
In oversimplified terms, universal reconciliation speaks of the eventual redemption of every soul ever created through the work of the Messiah and His sacrifice on the cross. This teaching does not remove the existence of hell, or the suffering associated with it, but it does challenge it’s never ending duration, and the purpose of the flames.
This series of posts, on the book “Heaven’s Doors” will be my last on the topic of universal reconciliation (not universalism). I am thankful to my Calvinist friend for directing me to this “heresy”. The teaching of universal reconciliation has more Scriptural support than I imagined and is worth considering if you are of an open mind and willing to consider alternate views to expand your understanding of the Word.
Of course if you are convinced you are completely right, without error, and doctrinally pure, this topic would be a waste of your time. Please move on!
This post will address The Book of Life
And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire. – Revelation 20:15
But nothing unclean will ever enter it, nor anyone who does what is detestable or false, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s book of life. – Revelation 21:27
The Book of Life is spoken of in the New Testament in many areas and in many ways, but I would like to restrict myself to the passages Mr. Sarris refers to in his book. After all, we are discussing the book “Heaven’s Doors”, and the topics he brings up.
If the Lake of Fire is a temporary condition, albeit a potentially extremely long period, how can we understand the fact that if a name isn’t found in the Book of Life, they will never enter the New Jerusalem. Revelation 21:9-27 describe the beauty, glory and inhabitants of the New Jerusalem , and the passage ends with verse 27, where we find out that entrance or access to the city will be through inclusion in the Lambs Book of Life. If you name isn’t in it, no access! In the Lake of Fire you shall go!
This seems to be a slam dunk for restriction from the Heavenly City. The Lake of Fire may have a time element to it (see previous posts) but there doesn’t seem to be a time element to the restriction to the city. This must surely be the set of verses that completely negates the teaching of Universal Reconciliation.
By the way, when Abram comes to the entrance to the New Jerusalem, does the Lamb’s Book of Life record his name as Abram, or Abraham? How about Saul? Or Simon, renamed Peter?
Early on in the book of Revelation, a promise is given to the church of Pergamum.
He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who conquers I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, with a new name written on the stone that no one knows except the one who receives it.’ – Rev 2:17
The Lambs Book of Life has names in it. A limited number of names. These names represent created ones.
Will you become a new creation, and receive a new name, that is waiting for you in the Lamb’s Book of Life?
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. – 2Co 5:17
15 For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. – Gal 6:15
Trust in the Lord Jesus, receive His love and mercy, His salvation from sin and death, by way of His cruel death and resurrection from the dead.
For he says, “In a favorable time I listened to you, and in a day of salvation I have helped you.” Behold, now is the favorable time; behold, now is the day of salvation. – 2Co 6:2 ESV
Become a new creation now, even as you read this short post. Trust in His provision, His grace. Admit your sin before Him, agree that you have been rebellious against His will, and ask for forgiveness, for life and the power to follow after Him. He is good.
For the first 20 yrs of my life, I shied away from it due to my upbringing and the mind numbing fears I lived through as a child and young adult. (Check out My Testimony for an explanation)
After I became a believer, I hunted and pecked through the book for key verses that would comfort me. But still the memories haunted me and I generally steered away from it. To my loss!
Occasionally I would hear some preaching on the letters to the churches of Revelation, and was introduced to the teaching that each church in the second and third chapter of the book represented a church age. Some teachers split the ages up into specific dates, identifying each age with a predominant characteristic. Initially this appealed to me, since it was presented in a spreadsheet, and most anything in a spreadsheet is super cool for me!
But after thinking about the breakout, I began to struggle with accepting it. It didn’t ring true, at least in this last few hundred years, where the teaching is that we are in the period of the church of Laodicea. I don’t know if those believers in persecuted lands would identify with this designation of being a lukewarm church.
There may be some general truth to this teaching. After all, it is the book of Revelation, and such a mysterious book, full of layers and meanings.
Ok, with that said, let’s move forward many years in my pilgrimage, and stop at a time during a different study topic.
I have found, much to my utter shock, that the book of Revelation depends on Old Testament teaching more than any other book of the New Testament. This floored me. And it opened up an interest in the Book that I hadn’t expected.
Combining both of these topics never occurred to me until I picked up a book by David Chilton.
You see, he has suggested that the letters to the churches are historical, and represent ages of believers, but not from the standpoint of the apostle John’s future, but of Israel’s past.
Yes – of Israel’s past!
Get out!
Join me as I seek to explain an additional viewpoint of the letters to the churches, and of the wonders of this incredible book.
In oversimplified terms, universal reconciliation speaks of the eventual redemption of every soul ever created through the work of the Messiah and His sacrifice on the cross. This teaching does not remove the existence of hell, or the suffering associated with it, but it does challenge it’s never ending duration, and the purpose of the flames.
This series of posts, on the book “Heaven’s Doors” will be my last on the topic of universal reconciliation (not universalism). I am thankful to my Calvinist friend for directing me to this “heresy”. The teaching of universal reconciliation has more Scriptural support than I imagined and is worth considering if you are of an open mind and willing to consider alternate views to expand your understanding of the Word.
Of course if you are convinced you are completely right, without error, and doctrinally pure, this topic would be a waste of your time. Please move on!
This post will continue to address The Lake of Fire
The Purpose of the Lake of Fire.
Ok, so the possibility of the duration of the Lake of Fire has been discussed. Lets take a quick look at the purpose of the lake of fire and see if we can get instruction from the passage
First off, the verses under consideration
and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever. – Revelation 20:10
But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” – Revelation 21:8
According to Revelation 21:8, who is in the Lake of Fire. Read the list again. And what is their “portion”?
Part (Noun, a Portion; Verb, to Give or Divide, Partake): denotes (a) “a part, portion,” of the whole, e.g., Jhn 13:8; Rev 20:6; 22:19; hence, “a lot” or “destiny,” e.g., Rev 21:8; in Mat 24:51; Luk 12:46, “portion;”
This portion, is a part of a whole. A whole what? Is John speaking of the age? Their portion of the age is to suffer? Their portion of the suffering is the age? I’m asking questions, and I am not gonna build an entire thought on this definition, but some of this may supplement the thoughts provided in the previous post on the duration of the age.
On to the description of the Lake of Fire.
Jesus used the same two terms defining the judgement on Sodom and Gomorrah in Luke 17:29
but on the day when Lot went out from Sodom, fire and sulfur rained from heaven and destroyed them all – Luke 17:29
This is the only other instance I can find the terms “fire and sulfur” combined and this judgement on Sodom and Gomorrah is also described by both Moses and Jude.
Moses writes of Abrahams experience.
Then the LORD rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from the LORD out of heaven. – Genesis 19:24
And he looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah and toward all the land of the valley, and he looked and, behold, the smoke of the land went up like the smoke of a furnace. – Genesis 19:28
Moses recites to the the Israelites the history of the doomed cities.
the whole land burned out with brimstone and salt, nothing sown and nothing growing, where no plant can sprout, an overthrow like that of Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, which the LORD overthrew in his anger and wrath– – Deuteronomy 29:23
Jude speaks of that terrible judgement in verse 7 of his epistle
just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire. – Jude 1:7
A few items to glean from the above verses
Sulfur and fire rained down on Sodom & Gomorrah.
Abraham looked back and saw the smoke rising. Smoke is evidence of a fire, but may not include the fire.
Moses speaks of the result of the land burned out with brimstone (sulfur) and salt, the utter wastefulness of the land
Jude speaks of the punishment of eternal fire.
If hope you noticed what I missed for years. Jude speaks of eternal fire, and yet Moses implies the fire was over, only smoke arising from the ashes, and the result was a wasteland, not a continual fire. So what gives? How can Jude speak of the fire as being eternal?
He isn’t! Two things are going on here, as best as I can tell.
First, the term eternal in Jude is the same term (aiōnios) we tripped over in our last post. This term is often translated as “age” and may not be referring to a never ending condition. This may be helpful, but to describe the fire of Sodom as age long still doesn’t help me with Moses statement of Abraham looking back and seeing smoke (and not fire)
Secondly, the term term (aiōnios) is modifying the punishment, not the fire. The punishment was eternal, or better stated, the punishment was age-long.
Ok, I think we slipped into the duration description again but I’m sure you will forgive me.
Back to the Purpose of the Lake of Fire. Two terms will be addressed for your consideration.
Pain (Noun and Verb):primarily signifies “to rub on the touchstone, to put to the test” (from basanos, “a touchstone,” a dark stone used in testing metals); hence, “to examine by torture,” and, in general, “to distress;” in Rev 12:2, “in pain,” RV (AV, “pained”), in connection with parturition. See TORMENT. (In the Sept., 1Sa 5:3.).
The original meaning of torment was the “action of an inspector who sought to test the quality of gold and silver coins” Heaven’s Doors, George Sarris, page 183. It is interesting that the purpose of the torture is testing, not punishment. Not retribution but testing. There is a difference!
Sulfur
Mr. Sarris referred to a web site describing the purposes of sulfur which I found somewhat interesting, with the following except
Sulphur was used by pagan priests 2,000 years before the birth of Christ. Pre-Roman civilizations used burned brimstone as a medicine and used “bricks” of sulphur as fumigants, bleaching agents, and incense in religious rites. Pliny (23-27 A.D.) Reported that sulphur was a “most singular kind of earth and an agent of great power on other substances,” and had “medicinal [sic] virtues” (Cunningham 1935:17). The Romans used sulphur or fumes from its combustion as an insecticide and to purify a sick room and cleanse its air of evil (Cunningham 1935). The same uses were reported by Homer in the Odyssey in 1000 B.C.
In summary, it appears the ancient reader, whom John was writing to, may have understood the Lake of Fire somewhat differently that us moderns do.
The duration of the Lake of Fire may be age-long and not “eternal” as in our current way of thinking
The purpose of the Lake of Fire on the one suffering may be of
testing
purifying
a medicinal quality
a cleansing agent.
At the very least, some of these findings have provided much to consider in my musings and have been offered to my reader to consider.
If you have comments, please supply below. Thanks for reading and hope to see you again next time.
In oversimplified terms, universal reconciliation speaks of the eventual redemption of every soul ever created through the work of the Messiah and His sacrifice on the cross. This teaching does not remove the existence of hell, or the suffering associated with it, but it does challenge it’s never ending duration, and the purpose of the flames.
This series of posts, on the book “Heaven’s Doors” will be my last on the topic of universal reconciliation (not universalism). I am thankful to my Calvinist friend for directing me to this “heresy”. The teaching of universal reconciliation has more Scriptural support than I imagined and is worth considering if you are of an open mind and willing to consider alternate views to expand your understanding of the Word.
Of course if you are convinced you are completely right, without error, and doctrinally pure, this topic would be a waste of your time. Please move on!
This post will address The Lake of Fire
and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever. – Revelation 20:10
But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” – Revelation 21:8
Much needs to be said on the last few chapters of Revelation in regard to the topic of Universal Reconciliation, but for this post, we will be addressing two questions regarding the Lake of Fire.
The Duration – Is it forever and ever? (Carl – the text says it is. Why even ask? Are you gonna twist the Scripture again?)
The Purpose – Is it for retribution of past sins? Is it to punish for temporal sin committed in this life?
Let’s consider a few items that Mr. Sarris brought out to discuss in his book.
The Duration of the Lake of Fire
Revelation 20:10 speaks of the Lake of Fire and the duration of the torment of the beast and the false prophet. (Similar descriptions of the torment inflicted upon those who accept the mark of the best may be found in Revelation 14:10 and 14:11.)
Torment day and night, forever and ever. How utterly horrible. No matter how you view this, the experience of torment, in any sane persons mind, is to be avoided at all costs! No matter what we may find in our study, any torment, any destruction, any suffering must be avoided at all costs! Do not continue in your rebellion against the loving Savior, who took the suffering, abandonment and death, in order that you may have joy in knowing the true God and His Son Jesus Christ.
Note that the term “forever and ever” is the same term we have dealt with earlier in the post Book Look – Heaven’s Doors – Unpardonable Sin Within this post I would like to consider forever and ever. The term John uses is aiōn. (we seem to keep running into this term, don’t we!)
Strongs definition
αἰώνaiṓn, ahee-ohn’; from the same as G104; properly, an age; by extension, perpetuity (also past); by implication, the world; specially (Jewish) a Messianic period (present or future):—age, course, eternal, (for) ever(-more), (n-)ever, (beginning of the , while the) world (began, without end). Compare G5550.
Find a few verses below to assist in our understanding of this term.
Jesus defined the time He was living in as an age, but used the same term (aiōn) we find in Revelation.
And Jesus said to them, “The sons of this age (aiōn) marry and are given in marriage, – Luke 20:34
Should we consider the time Jesus was in, as an eternal never ending period of time?
“The sons of this forever and ever period of time?
I suppose it depends how we understand this word.
So it will be at the end of the age (aiōn). The angels will come out and separate the evil from the righteous – Matthew 13:49 teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age (aiōn).” – Matthew 28:20
First thing to notice that this word allows for the time to be defined with an end. That is definitely not fitting in with my understanding of everlasting or eternal. Also, why wouldn’t this term be translated as the end of “forever and ever” if that is the only correct understanding of aiōn.
Let’s move on
who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions, and in the age to come eternal life. – Mark 10:30 who will not receive many times more in this time, and in the age to come eternal life.” – Luke 18:30
Jesus describes an age to come. What? Another forever and ever? Now I am confused! What in tarnation is going on? Hang on, it gets worse, especially if you are trying to hang on to the idea that aiōn is strictly defining an eternal everlasting state!
far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come. – Ephesians 1:21 ESV
Paul speaks of one “forever and ever” following another “forever and ever”, or that a “forever and ever” was yet to come, from his standpoint. So he is referring to one coming “forever and ever” after the one he is in. Got it!
so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. – Ephesians 2:7
Come on Paul. Now there are coming ages, that is more than one age coming after the one you are writing in? This is bonkers! How can I reconcile this with the concept of eternal or everlasting that is embedded in my thoughts?
But to the point, does this teaching allow for the possibility that the “forever and ever” we find in Revelation 20:10 may have an end to it, may be prior to an age after it and may mess my thinking up more that it already has?
I’ll tell you right now, that my thinking about eternity and everlasting is perty messed up right now! But that is alright! Remember the Word is not a cartoon or comic that we simply read for a few seconds and walk away from. It is a message we need to understand and have our minds adjusted to in order to see the Lord and His ways a bit clearer every day.
I have grown a bit long in the tooth with this post and will continue with the Purpose of the Lake of Fire in the next installment. I hope you can join me then.
As always, if you have a comment or question, please take advantage of the comment box below. I look forward to your ideas and thoughts! Thanks for reading and hope to see you again next time.
In oversimplified terms, universal reconciliation speaks of the eventual redemption of every soul ever created through the work of the Messiah and His sacrifice on the cross. This teaching does not remove the existence of hell, or the suffering associated with it, but it does challenge it’s never ending duration, and the purpose of the flames.
This series of posts, on the book “Heaven’s Doors” will be my last on the topic of universal reconciliation (not universalism). I am thankful to my Calvinist friend for directing me to this “heresy”. The teaching of universal reconciliation has more Scriptural support than I imagined and is worth considering if you are of an open mind and willing to consider alternate views to expand your understanding of the Word.
Of course if you are convinced you are completely right, without error, and doctrinally pure, this topic would be a waste of your time. Please move on!
This post will address No Repentance
For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt. – Hebrews 6:4-6
This is a tuff one. No matter where you stand in your theology, this passage gives you some heartache. And I am thankful for a passage that ruffles a systematic theology, that upsets a logical progression of thought that we could trust, (instead of God Himself).
I understand that no matter what is presented in this post (little lone every one of my posts), there will be minor (or major) disagreement.
I struggled with this concept for years, until I realized Jesus chose a tax collector and a zealot to follow him. Enemies with completely different world views, that came out of a life that pitted them against each other. Surely some of this difference impacted their impressions and understanding of the gospel.
Another example is James and Paul. Both godly men, with tremendous influence, and seemingly varied viewpoints on fleshing out the gospel for the saints they watched over.
Whoever wrote Hebrews, had a different viewpoint on the gospel that, say, Paul. Same gospel, same Jesus, same core message, yet the presentation was different.
Understanding this, let us consider Hebrews 6. Prior to the writer speaking of the impossibility of repentance in this passage, he writes the following passage.
About this we have much to say, and it is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing. For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food, for everyone who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, since he is a child. But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil. – Hebrews 5:11-14
The audience is a bunch of immature, believers that are unskilled in the word of righteousness. He has been addressing this condition throughout the book, but just before he gets to our passage under consideration, he speaks of his limitations of sharing truth based on the audiences maturity level.
They can’t handle the truth! It is impossible for them to handle the truth, to understand and accept the message he wants to present them.
Ok, now that we have set the stage, lets turn the page and consider the authors message in Hebrews 6.
Many may try to say that the one who is being described in chapter 6:4-6 is one who is not yet a believer. So close to trusting, but had turned away and become hardened against the gospel. I personally can not see that for a number of reasons but the primary one is that the author speaks of the one “tasting the heavenly gift”.
Just a few short chapters earlier, the author speaks of Christ “tasting death”. This “tasting” is not a simply a “touch to the tongue”, but a complete experience of the object spoken of. Jesus completely tasted death. This one in Hebrews 6 completely tasted the heavenly gift.
No – me thinks this one in Hebrews is a true disciple.
But the author says it is impossible…. to restore them. Mr. Sarris make note on two points
Impossible
In Matthew 19:25 – 26, we read
When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?” But Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
The disciples were stumped on the truth they were hearing. Who can be saved? This is beyond our understanding, it is unbelievable, over our heads!
Jesus redirected their focus onto God, and claimed it was impossible for men, but not with God. The same Greek word is used here as in Hebrews, and is addressing the same general thought of impossibility to perform a work of salvation.
Note Strong’s definition for impossible
ἀδύνατοςadýnatos, ad-oo’-nat-os; from G1 (as a negative particle) and G1415; unable, i.e. weak (literally or figuratively); passively, impossible:—could not do, impossible, impotent, not possible, weak.
The term is relative to the subject. By that I mean, if a challenge is provided to a weak man, the challenge may be “impossible” for the weak man, but the same challenge is of no difficulty for a strong man.
Thought of another way, if my dear brother Blair takes me to a gym, and presents a set of dumb bells with 80 lbs. on it, it is impossible for me to lift it – I am a weak man! But Blair he can lift it be simply thinking about it – He is super massive strong!
Who is doing the restoring?
We may need to consider this same truth for this passage in Hebrews, where those spoken to are described as weak, immature believers. Any repentance granted must surely come from God, and it is impossible for these children in the faith to even join in with the work of restoration.
Might the author be simply putting the believers in their place. A wee bit of shame to challenge them on to maturity?
What think you?
Is the passage defining a completely static situation, in which there is no hope of repentance no matter who is involved or when it may occur?
Is it an impossible situation, or just something these believers have no skill in joining in with God on the work?
As Jesus mentioned in Matthew 19, the impossibility may not effect God’s ability, simply man’s ability.
In oversimplified terms, universal reconciliation speaks of the eventual redemption of every soul ever created through the work of the Messiah and His sacrifice on the cross. This teaching does not remove the existence of hell, or the suffering associated with it, but it does challenge it’s never ending duration, and the purpose of the flames.
This series of posts, on the book “Heaven’s Doors” will be my last on the topic of universal reconciliation (not universalism). I am thankful to my Calvinist friend for directing me to this “heresy”. The teaching of universal reconciliation has more Scriptural support than I imagined and is worth considering if you are of an open mind and willing to consider alternate views to expand your understanding of the Word.
Of course if you are convinced you are completely right, without error, and doctrinally pure, this topic would be a waste of your time. Please move on!
This post will address Anathema
I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed. – Galatians 1:6-9
Wow. False preachers and teachers are doomed to hell. That is the message I understood as I listened to various “non-false” preachers and teachers through the years. But I always came away from these messages full of fear, fear that, even as a believer, I might say something or do something that would constitute false teaching!
A little background to the passage under consideration. Paul won the galations to Christ on his first missionary journey and had suffered terribly on the trip. He had a heart for these believers and wanted only the best for them. But after hearing of their defection from Christ, he was livid! Livid with the gullible galations, and piping hot with the false teachers!
These teachers were adding to the work of Christ for the believer, distracting them from His loving kindness by getting them to focus on themselves. They had come in after Paul’s work in the area, and completely ravaged his message of the gospel of grace through Christ. Adding Jewish requirements to the freedom they had found in Christ, burdening them with sabbath laws, food restrictions, bodily appearances (if your a man – know what I mean?)
For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery. – Galatians 5:1
So when he declares that any who preach a false gospel be under anathema, that surely means continual, conscious terror in torments and sulfer, suffering under the wrath of God in the Lake of Fire. Surely it means that!
Lets look at the term to justify this teaching, (or to get some clarity!)
The term translated as “accursed” is the Greek term anathema. According to this except from Vines Expository Dictionary, the general meaning of the word is “the disfavor of Jehovah”. The following verses include this term in the New Testament
They went to the chief priests and elders and said, “We have strictly bound ourselves by an oath (anathema) to taste no food till we have killed Paul. – Acts 23:14
These assassin wannabe’s were dead serious in taking Paul out of the equation for the sake of the Jewish religion. They cursed themselves with a curse, calling down God’s disfavor upon their own heads if they did not kill Paul. You know, if they only had listened to Paul, they would have realized they needed not to call God’s disfavor down upon themselves, since they already were condemned, under the wrath of God, until they came to know the very Person they were persecuting!
For I could wish that I myself were accursed (anathema) and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my kinsmen according to the flesh. – Romans 9:3
This verse causes some concern for those who may be committed to the once saved always saved camp, if the term accursed actually means to be sent to hell, to suffer continually in flames and torment. This is Paul’s wish, that he go to hell in order for the sake of his Jewish brethren. But Paul – you are a Christian – you cannot go to hell. But that is the conclusion if anathema actually should be understood to equal hell fire and torment.
But if we look at the term as meaning “to be under Jehovah’s disfavor”, this allows for much room to understand the condition Paul is speaking of here. For Paul to be under God’s disfavor may be a condition he would experience on the earth, prior to his death, while journeying or preaching. We simply do not know the specific scope of Paul’s meaning when he uses this term, other than it is very negative and a claim to the extent of Paul’s love for the Jews.
Therefore I want you to understand that no one speaking in the Spirit of God ever says “Jesus is accursed!” (anathema) and no one can say “Jesus is Lord” except in the Holy Spirit. – 1 Corinthians 12:3
The Spirit will never lead anyone to say that Jesus is “under Jehovah’s disfavor”. How could that be, since He pleased the Father in all things, and was obedient to death, even the death of the cross.
But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. (anathema) As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed. (anathema) Galatians 1:8-9
Back to our original verses under consideration. Can you see that Paul is enraged at the destruction that the church has suffered under these false preachers and teachers. He calls upon them Jehovah’s disfavor, handing them over to God, in order for Him (and not the apostle) to teach them truth, to discipline them, to correct them and if all else fails to destroy them, (physical death?)
To be accursed is a terrible frightful condition to be placed under. Let not the reader take this lightly, or to consider that to be under the disfavor of Jehovah is a minor inconvenience. To be under Jehovah’s disfavor, in my mind, may be likened to being under God’s wrath, as we all have been in our past, (or even the present, if you know not the Lord!)
Both of these conditions require, no – demand that the soul flee to the Savior, for He is the only One who has satisfied the Father. He is completely in union with and in the favor of the One True God.
Seek the Son, and trust Him.
May the Lord of Glory bless you as you seek His favor.
In oversimplified terms, universal reconciliation speaks of the eventual redemption of every soul ever created through the work of the Messiah and His sacrifice on the cross. This teaching does not remove the existence of hell, or the suffering associated with it, but it does challenge it’s never ending duration, and the purpose of the flames.
This series of posts, on the book “Heaven’s Doors” will be my last on the topic of universal reconciliation (not universalism). I am thankful to my Calvinist friend for directing me to this “heresy”. The teaching of universal reconciliation has more Scriptural support than I imagined and is worth considering if you are of an open mind and willing to consider alternate views to expand your understanding of the Word.
Of course if you are convinced you are completely right, without error, and doctrinally pure, this topic would be a waste of your time. Please move on!
This post will address Pharaoh’s Hardened Heart
For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” – Romans 9:17
What purpose? Why was Pharaoh raised up? In order to show His power in the King of Egypt, and that God’s name would be exalted in all the earth.
And I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and he will pursue them, and I will get glory over Pharaoh and all his host, and the Egyptians shall know that I am the LORD.” And they did so. – Exodus 14:4 ESV
God states His purpose in Exodus 14:14, stating He will get glory over Pharaoh and all his host. What is this glory that God is referring to? Is it that Pharaoh and his entire host of Egypt burns in hell? I suppose, if you are looking for this passage to say that, you might find it, but I am not recognizing anything in the verse regarding an afterlife experience. Yup – I just not seeing where this passage would require Pharaoh to be eternally condemned to conscious torment in hell for ever.
Let me suggest an alternative view for my readers to consider. Per Mr. Sarris’ notes, Pharaoh was hardened in order to allow God to exhibit all the plagues, in order that all might see the varied powers of the King of all Kings.
Then the LORD said to Moses, “Go in to Pharaoh, for I have hardened his heart and the heart of his servants, that I may show these signs of mine among them, – Exodus 10:1
God hardened Pharaohs heart in order to show signs and wonders to the Egyptians. The Egyptians had a multitude of gods and each plague exhibited God’s dominance over the Egyptians gods. He was declaring His power to the Egyptians, and to fully display His power, God hardened Pharaoh’s heart in order to create the conditions for the plagues. Early on, in Exodus 5:2, Pharoah stated
…“Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and moreover, I will not let Israel go.”
The issue is “knowing the Lord”. That is the intent of the plagues, and the plagues were completed due to the hardening of Pharaoh’s heart. In reality, both the children of Israel and the Egyptians needed to “know the Lord”. The plagues provided an opportunity for the deliverance of God’s people, and for the spreading of the glory of God to all peoples.
But may I ask – Is Pharaoh condemned to hell forever because of the hardening of his heart? The scriptures are clear that Pharaoh’s heart was hardened (by both Pharaoh and the Lord), and the implication is two fold.
Pharaoh remained in the hardened condition continually.
He is going to burn in hell forever.
It seems there may be some assumptions with the first implication. I have not found any place in the Scripture that clearly states the Pharaoh remained in hardness. Of course this argument is one of silence, but consider.
And I will harden the hearts of the Egyptians so that they shall go in after them, and I will get glory over Pharaoh and all his host, his chariots, and his horsemen. And the Egyptians shall know that I am the LORD, when I have gotten glory over Pharaoh, his chariots, and his horsemen.” – Exodus 14:17-18 ESV
Does not the Scripture state that the Egyptians shall know that I am the LORD. Could Pharaoh be considered an Egyptian? Might he have recognized the power and glory of the Lord, since this was God’s purpose, and we know that all things that God purposes is accomplished in His good time.
At the very least, the passage in Romans does not define Pharaoh’s afterlife or the extent of any suffering that he may experience.
Hardening
But, let’s think about this hardening. What does that mean?
You may find it curious that Moses used this same term “harden” for another character during his life. He was a young man, a servant to Moses, by the name of Joshua.
Moses commanded Joshua to…
Be strong (same word as “harden” when referring to Pharaoh) and courageous, for you shall cause this people to inherit the land that I swore to their fathers to give them. Only be strong (same word as “harden” when referring to Pharaoh) and very courageous, being careful to do according to all the law that Moses my servant commanded you. Do not turn from it to the right hand or to the left, that you may have good success wherever you go. – Joshua 1:6-7
Of course I am not implying that Moses was telling Joshua to have a hardened heart towards the Master, but to be resolute, have a backbone, stand up to resistance, and to be firm.
God made Pharaoh resolute in refusing to release the Children of Israel, in order to show His glory to the nations. The length of the hardening of Pharaohs heart is not given to us, and to state that Pharaoh has no chance at redemption by the hand of the Messiah seems to be a stretch too far!
In conclusion, I would like to provide a quote from Mr. Sarris’ book
“God made Pharaohs heart firm so he would not buckle under the immense pressure that would come on him when God’s power was being demonstrated”
What are your thoughts? Do you consider Pharaoh unredeemable? Is there scripture that clearly states Pharaohs after life condition?
It is true that Pharaoh’s heart was hardened by his own decisions and by the Lord. Might the Lord also have the power to soften Pharaohs heart, by the exhibition of His power and glory? You be the judge.
Thanks for reading along with my post and if you have a comment, please provide below.