Does the Bible lend itself to a LITERAL reading?
Our last post on this topic dealt with the question
“Is all the Bible to be read literally?”
We discussed the literal definition of the word “literal” – Oh how boring…., and genres of literature that passages within the Bible fall into. (somewhat interesting….)
This post, I would like to focus on the question
Is the message intended to be taken literally?
This is the heart of the message I am trying to communicate!
The intended (or true) meaning may be clouded or completely in error if taken literally.
Sometimes the message isn’t completely clear and the author will correct the misunderstanding. The following passages are offered to try to explain this concept.
Lets see if some of the messages Jesus gave in the Gospel of John were meant to be taken literally.
- A Literal Temple
When Jesus said “Destroy this Temple”, the religious leaders understood the literal temple. Might this have been a mistake?
John 2:18-2118 So the Jews said to him, “What sign do you show us for doing these things?”19 Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”20 The Jews then said, “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will you raise it up in three days?”21 But he was speaking about the temple of his body.
- A Literal Rebirth
When Nicodemus came to Jesus, Jesus told him he must be born again. Did Nicodemus take this literally?
John 3:3-93 Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.”4 Nicodemus said to him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?”5 Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.7 Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’8 The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.”9 Nicodemus said to him, “How can these things be?”
- A Literal Well
When Jesus told the woman at the well about living water, and she asked Jesus about a bucket and the depth of the well, was she taking Jesus’ words too literally?
John 4:9-119 The Samaritan woman said to him, “How is it that you, a Jew, ask for a drink from me, a woman of Samaria?” (For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.)10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is that is saying to you, ‘Give me a drink,’ you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.”11 The woman said to him, “Sir, you have nothing to draw water with, and the well is deep. Where do you get that living water?
- A Literal Lunch
When the disciples came back from the town, after Jesus discussion with the woman at the well, they were confused about what Jesus had eaten. Maybe the disciples understood Him too literally?
John 4:31-3531 Meanwhile the disciples were urging him, saying, “Rabbi, eat.”32 But he said to them, “I have food to eat that you do not know about.”33 So the disciples said to one another, “Has anyone brought him something to eat?”34 Jesus said to them, “My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to accomplish his work.35 Do you not say, ‘There are yet four months, then comes the harvest’? Look, I tell you, lift up your eyes, and see that the fields are white for harvest.
- His Literal Flesh
How about when Jesus taught that His flesh was to be eaten and His blood was to be drank. Should that be taken literally?
John 6:48-5248 I am the bread of life.49 Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died.50 This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die.51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”52 The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
The Person of Christ
How about the “I am” statements in the Gospel? Shall literalness help us in our understanding of the person of Christ? Shall we consider the Messiah to be…
- A Literal Light
12 Again Jesus spoke to them, saying, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”
5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.”
- A Literal Door
7 So Jesus again said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep.
- A Literal (Path)way
6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
- A Literal Vine
1 “I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser.
John 15: 5
5 I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.
Two final points come to mind at this time.
- Many times throughout the gospels, those who took the sayings of Jesus too literally either
- Were in a state of confusion, but eventually found clarity,
- refused to consider anything other than the literal understanding.
Those who were confused but hungry and teachable eventually got the message. Those who refused to consider any other understanding seemed to be associated with His enemies.
- Throughout the gospel, there are thousands of instances where depending on literalness causes confusion. And thousands of instances where it occurs in Johns other writings. Thousands! Even in Revelation. Thousands I tell you, thousands!
Thanks again for coming to visit. I hope you found something of interest in this post and would appreciate a comment, to begin a discussion.